![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
However, there are a few legal issues here that bug me:
1) If you suspect a crime is or has been committed, don't delete a journal, call the cops!!
2) If you accuse someone publicly of criminal behavior, but can't/don't/won't back it up with evidence and reporting it to the authorities, you could be committing libel and defamation.
3) Deleting journals and communities on the basis of keywords in interests is pretty slipshod.
4) Fiction, fantasy, or discussion of lusts and thoughts is not the same as doing them, even under the current mess of US Law. Really.
5) Isn't breaking/violating your own process as described in your ToS a breach of contract??
6) Trying to claim listed "interests" mean that a person "likes" or "advocates" them would probably get laughed out of court, IMO.
7) As I understand it, a person's content is theirs, and a hosting service is shielded by the "common carrier" provisions of the law *if* they do not exercise editorial control over it. Deleting "objectionable", but not illegal, content could be construed as exercising editorial control.
Again, IANAL, nor do I play one on TV.
I need to have defined for me what rights I have under my permanent membership contract with LJ. If they can blithely change their ToS on the fly about this stuff, what else can they do, without me having any recourse other than abandoning my journal (and money)? Will I log in one day to a page full of ads for fundie churches, my journal redacted of all content not fit for sheltered 5 year olds??
1) If you suspect a crime is or has been committed, don't delete a journal, call the cops!!
2) If you accuse someone publicly of criminal behavior, but can't/don't/won't back it up with evidence and reporting it to the authorities, you could be committing libel and defamation.
3) Deleting journals and communities on the basis of keywords in interests is pretty slipshod.
4) Fiction, fantasy, or discussion of lusts and thoughts is not the same as doing them, even under the current mess of US Law. Really.
5) Isn't breaking/violating your own process as described in your ToS a breach of contract??
6) Trying to claim listed "interests" mean that a person "likes" or "advocates" them would probably get laughed out of court, IMO.
7) As I understand it, a person's content is theirs, and a hosting service is shielded by the "common carrier" provisions of the law *if* they do not exercise editorial control over it. Deleting "objectionable", but not illegal, content could be construed as exercising editorial control.
Again, IANAL, nor do I play one on TV.
I need to have defined for me what rights I have under my permanent membership contract with LJ. If they can blithely change their ToS on the fly about this stuff, what else can they do, without me having any recourse other than abandoning my journal (and money)? Will I log in one day to a page full of ads for fundie churches, my journal redacted of all content not fit for sheltered 5 year olds??
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
From:
no subject
Hard for them to fuck it up against our wishes when we own them, literally.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I went and changed my interest to the best '4 letter, 50-character or less' phrase on how this sucks. Anything more and it wouldn't take.
I ended up with
Interests: 1: watching lj censor pathetically.
From:
no subject
not doing anything wrong
being harmless
wording interests carefully
tiptoeing around censors
rewriting my profile
not talking about torture
Hell, the whole current pResidential administration is very interested in that last one.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
To arms citizens
Form your battalions
March, march
Let impure blood
Water our furrows
which is clearly a death threat against my enemies, right?
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I don't think they'd get it. :)
I don't think they'd get anything shy of "Watching LJ Burn" as an interest for that matter.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
They have something about it at:
http://blogscript.blogspot.com/2007/05/live-journal-attacked-by-inocents.html
From:
no subject
I too have a permanent account - if you find out anything we permanent members can do to protect ourselves, please let me know? - I won't be on par with what I've paid for for another few years yet, I think - and that just isn't fair.
lj scares me.