![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Vermont, Iowa, DC, now Maine. Why is Californika so backward? Massive political propaganda efforts by the LDS and Catholic churches.
How do I get a ballot prop to shitcan Prop 8 on the ballot in 2010?? Something like:
"SECTION 1. Title This measure shall be known and may be cited as the "California Marriage Equality Act."
SECTION 2. Change Section 7.5 of Article I of the California Constitution, to read:
SEC. 7.5. All marriages between two consenting adults are equally valid and recognized in California. "
If this won't pass, then remove the word "marriage" from all California state laws and Constitution. If "marriage" is a religious institution to be "protected", then it has no business in US or State law, because of the First Amendment. If it's civil, then religious biases against it are moot.
How do I get a ballot prop to shitcan Prop 8 on the ballot in 2010?? Something like:
"SECTION 1. Title This measure shall be known and may be cited as the "California Marriage Equality Act."
SECTION 2. Change Section 7.5 of Article I of the California Constitution, to read:
SEC. 7.5. All marriages between two consenting adults are equally valid and recognized in California. "
If this won't pass, then remove the word "marriage" from all California state laws and Constitution. If "marriage" is a religious institution to be "protected", then it has no business in US or State law, because of the First Amendment. If it's civil, then religious biases against it are moot.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
From:
no subject
If marriage, is the pervue of religion, the religious unions should not be recognized by governmental and legal documents. "Civil union" or "domestic partnership/union" would then be the only legally recognized word to describe a committed relationship entered into by legal adults. Those who wish to "marry" within a religious ceremony can, but clergy should no longer have the right to make it a legal binding. That right would be under the auspices of the legal system.
If a clergyperson also passed the legal bar, then, and only then, would they have the capacity to also perform the legal union.