ravan: by icons r us (flamethrower - from icons r us)
ravan ([personal profile] ravan) wrote2006-08-10 03:05 pm
Entry tags:

"Liquid Explosives"

OK, I've read some of the articles and such about liquid explosives from the BBC. They all allude to some vague, nebulous ingredients that might be able to be combined to make a liquid explosive, or combining a liquid and a solid.

They read like bullshit, as in, as credible as "red mercury" being a nuclear material.

Yes, there are liquids that can be combined to make explosives. In order to get explosives out of these, they have to be highly concentrated. Some are considered "volatile". This means they stink.

Take acetone, a well known ingredient in nail polish remover. The concentration is low, the smell is high. If someone decided to "do their nails" on an airplane flight, they'd get lynched - that shit is vicious in an enclosed environment.

Or various acidic drain cleaners: hard to handle and package without burning yourself, or sufficiently low strength to not do anything more than fizzle. These stink too.

Hydrogen peroxide: the stuff you can buy in the drugstore is low concentration. It would have to be concentrated (not a simple process), then repacked in the original bottle. It smells when you open it, too. Hair bleach developer has a slightly higher concentration, but again has the smell problem.

Gasoline/Fuel oil: first, it smells; second, its already prohibited in aircraft cabins.

So, basically, it would take a lot of effort, coordination, and ingenuity by the terrorists, plus gross apathy on the part of their fellow passengers. Ain't gonna happen. Not when passengers that look like they *might* be doing something funky get tackled promptly by fellow travellers.

[identity profile] raindrops.livejournal.com 2006-08-11 04:15 am (UTC)(link)
The presumed right to travel, however, is firmly established in U.S. law and precedent.

Hey, guess what?

It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. (from Supreme Court ruling, Marbury v. Madison)

Who knew? The Supreme Court says that there's a separation of powers. OK, they said it once upon a time... we got a bunch of pansyarse rubberstamp motherfuckers on the bench now. But it's still the law.

Sheep are sheep.

And along with sheep and wolves, there are sheepdogs. Fear the dawg. ;-)

[identity profile] ravan.livejournal.com 2006-08-11 08:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Hey, guess what?

Yeah, law, precedent and even the Constitution don't matter much to this administration.

And along with sheep and wolves, there are sheepdogs. Fear the dawg. ;-)

o/~ You ain't nothin' but a houn' dawg... o/~

;-)